What will the court consider when deciding who the child should live with?
There are many factors a Court will take into consideration when deciding who a child should live with.
These factors are set out in section 60CC (3) (a) – (k), of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth).
Without boring you with the long list, some of these include:
- the practical difficulty of the child spending time with both parents;
- the extent that both parents have cared for the child during their lifetime; and importantly
- any wishes expressed by the child.
When a child expresses a wish, there is a broad discretion for any judicial officer to decide on the weight given to those wishes.
The Court will look at the age and maturity of the child, together with any possible influences over the child when expressing their wishes.
There is no prescriptive age that says, when a child turns XX, they can decide where they live. If anyone tells you there is, this is simply not correct.
In the Bondelmonte case, the court goes against the wishes of the children
Only most recently, in the case of Bondelmonte, the Court ordered to the contrary of what a 15 and 17-year-old expressly wished to do. The 15 and 17-year-old expressed a strong wish to remain living in the United States with their Father.
The Court, against the childrens’ wishes, ordered for the children to return to Australia and live with their Mother.
In this matter, the two boys went on a holiday to New York to see their Father. The Orders provided for this holiday to occur. Whilst travelling in New York, the two sons decided they did not wish to return to Australia and live with their Mother and rather, expressed a strong wish to remain living in New York.
The Family Court ordered the return of the children. The Court found that although the children had expressed this wish, the Father had played a role in orchestrating this wish of the children and that it was in the two boys best wishes to return to Australia to live with their mother and their 12-year-old sister.
What resources does the court use to make its decision?
The Court will often make orders to attempt to ascertain a child’s views. This is designed to assist the Judge with decision making.
The Court may order the child, particularly those children who are able to express a view, be interviewed by a Family Consultant (a person with an experience in social work and counselling) or a Single Expert Witness. These people are trained to write reports for the Court to assist in making decisions about the insight and maturity of a child when they express a view.
Try not to influence your child’s decision-making process
If your child is expressing a strong view, it is imperative that you respond in age-appropriate and development appropriate language that does not influence or attempt to cement their view.
We encourage our clients to seek assistance from a qualified child development psychologist, preferably a psychologist who has experience in family law disputes or breakdowns of families, to support their child during this time.
If you require any assistance in managing children’s expectations, presenting a child’s wishes to the Court with clarity (and without influence), please contact one of the lawyers at Meillon & Bright who can assist. We have extensive experience in complex parenting matters for children of all ages.
Legal advice and assistance during COVID-19
We continue to provide skilled and experienced family law services during the coronavirus outbreak.
We are working closely with the courts, our colleagues and clients to ensure services to all new and existing clients are delivered efficiently and with as little disruption as possible.
You can contact us by phone or email to arrange a telephone or video-conference consultation.
WA: 08 6245 0855
NSW: 02 9238 1958
About the Author
Today’s article is written by our director, Kristie Smith. You can learn more about Kristie’s expertise and experience here or get in touch with her directly about your family law matters by emailing email@example.com.
The information contained in this article is of general nature and should not be construed as legal advice.